Popular Posts

Search This Blog

Saturday, February 20, 2016

"Global Warming-Climate Change" Is it real and is it harmful?

One of the major issues with which politicians around the world seems to be obsessed with is what was once called 'Global Warming', a title that was altered to 'climate change' after proponents were discovered 'fabricating evidence' in support of their position.
1-"Global Warming ‘Experts’ Admit: We Lied" Warner Todd Huston September 17, 2013 http://wizbangblog.com/2013/09/17/global-warming-experts-admit-we-lied/
2-“World’s Biggest Lie has been exposed: Evil heart of the “global warming” hoax Global Warming: The BIGGEST LIE Exposed.” Alan Caruba, September 21, 2013 http://canadafreepress.com/article/global-warming-the-biggest-lie-exposed
3-”When scientists lie.” Ralph Peters, December 12, 2009 http://nypost.com/2009/12/12/when-scientists-lie/
4-”How the lie of global warming consensus among scientists came to pass.” Lorraine Cohen; San Diego Conservative Examiner-April 15, 2013: http://www.examiner.com/article/how-the-lie-of-global-warming-consensus-among-scientists-came-to-pass

What could be so important about an idea/issue that supporting that idea/issue could lead you to lie in public?
First: “What IS Climate Change? According to one leading dictionary reference, climate change is “a change in global or regional climate patterns, in particular a change apparent from the mid to late 20th century onwards and attributed largely to the increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide produced by the use of fossil fuels.” 
1. the composite or generally prevailing weather conditions of a region, as temperature, air pressure, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness, and winds, throughout the year, averaged over a series of years.
2. a region or area characterized by a given climate:
3. the prevailing attitudes, standards, or environmental conditions of a group, period, or place:
1. to make the form, nature, content, future course, etc., of (something) different from what it is or from what it would be if left alone: to change one's name; to change one's opinion; to change the course of history.
2. to transform or convert (usually followed by into): The witch changed the prince into a toad.
3. to substitute another or others for; exchange for something else, usually of the same kind:
She changed her shoes when she got home from the office.
4. to give and take reciprocally; interchange: to change places with someone.
5. to transfer from one (conveyance) to another: You'll have to change planes in Chicago.
6. to give or get an equivalent amount of money in lower denominations in exchange for:
to change a five-dollar bill.
7. to give or get foreign money in exchange for: to change dollars into francs.

The science is clear: Human activity is causing our climate to change.”

According to Wikipedia entry-”Climate Change:” Climate change is a change in the statistical distribution of weather patterns when that change lasts for an extended period of time (i.e., decades to millions of years). Climate change may refer to a change in average weather conditions, or in the time variation of weather around longer-term average conditions (i.e., more or fewer extreme weather events). Climate change is caused by factors such as biotic processes, variations in solar radiation received by Earth, plate tectonics, and volcanic eruptions. Certain human activities have also been identified as significant causes of recent climate change, often referred to as "global warming". Scientists actively work to understand past and future climate by using observations and theoretical models. A climate record—extending deep into the Earth's past—has been assembled, and continues to be built up, based on geological evidence from borehole temperature profiles, cores removed from deep accumulations of ice, floral and faunal records, glacial and periglacial processes, stable-isotope and other analyses of sediment layers, and records of past sea levels. More recent data are provided by the instrumental record. General circulation models, based on the physical sciences, are often used in theoretical approaches to match past climate data, make future projections, and link causes and effects in climate change.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change

According to the EPA-[United States Environmental Protection Agency] “Climate Change: Basic Information”-”Climate change is happening. Our Earth is warming. Earth's average temperature has risen by 1.5°F over the past century, and is projected to rise another 0.5 to 8.6°F over the next hundred years. Small changes in the average temperature of the planet can translate to large and potentially dangerous shifts in climate and weather.
The evidence is clear. Rising global temperatures have been accompanied by changes in weather and climate. Many places have seen changes in rainfall, resulting in more floods, droughts, or intense rain, as well as more frequent and severe heat waves. The planet's oceans and glaciers have also experienced some big changes - oceans are warming and becoming more acidic, ice caps are melting, and sea levels are rising. As these and other changes become more pronounced in the coming decades, they will likely present challenges to our society and our environment.”

According to the David Suzuki Foundation-(http://www.davidsuzuki.org/issues/climate-change/science/climate-change-basics/climate-change-101-1/) [There's a lot of information floating around about climate change. Most people know it has something to do with industrial pollution, changing weather and car exhaust, and they kind of get what Al Gore was trying to say in An Inconvenient Truth. In a nutshell, climate change occurs when long-term weather patterns are altered — for example, through human activity. Global warming is one measure of climate change, and is a rise in the average global temperature.]

Why is concern for “climate change” so important”? Let us examine the claims and allegations of supporters. Everyone who has any education has heard of N.A.S.A.-The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. According to the Frequenty Asked Questions page- http://climate.nasa.gov/faq/ - “Climate Change” is caused by [Most climate scientists agree the main cause of the current global warming trend is human expansion of the "greenhouse effect" warming that results when the atmosphere traps heat radiating from Earth toward space. Certain gases in the atmosphere block heat from escaping. Long-lived gases that remain semi-permanently in the atmosphere and do not respond physically or chemically to changes in temperature are described as "forcing" climate change. Gases, such as water vapor, which respond physically or chemically to changes in temperature are seen as "feedbacks."]
[An interesting article can be found at http://www.ifm-sei.org/files/up/climate-change-the-basic-facts.pdf]

The idea of man made climate change or global warming IS NOT a global consensus. For every article supporting the concept, there is a corresponding article refuting it.
-Climate Change, The Solar Weather Technique & The future of Forecasting – WeatherAct
Conference Imperial College London 28 Oct 2009 - Session 1 http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews09No80.pdf

National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Goddard Institute for Space Studies; GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/
Global Warming & Climate Change Myths- A summary of global warming-climate change myths, sorted by recent popularity vs what science says. http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
The Gaia Hypothesis: Conjectures and Refutations; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1023494111532

In short, for every opinion-scientific or amateur- there is a corresponding opposite opinion. I have a different position which I have not heard from any other person. I hold that IF there is a trend towards a global temperature rise, it is something that we should want. I WANT the global temperature to rise. Let me explain.

Global warming advocates claim that the melting of the polar caps will cause the oceans to rise. “Scientists Warn of Rising Oceans From Polar Melt.” Justin Gillis and Kenneth Chang May 12, 2014 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/13/science/earth/collapse-of-parts-of-west-antarctica-ice-sheet-has-begun-scientists-say.html?_r=0

As dramatic as that may sound, it is impossible. Why? Ice occupies multiple times more volume than does water. Ice is less dense than liquid water, which means that for the same mass, ice occupies more space. Water has to expand as it freezes. http://www.ask.com/science/ice-weigh-water-749f3a207f81e1b8
Simultaneously, as ice melts and converts into water-water evaporates and converts into water vapor. So, if the entire polar caps were to melt, the oceans would lower BUT simultaneous to this lowering, water vapor would rise merging with the upper atmosphere which then acts to reflect and deflect excessive harmful solar radiation. U.S. Geological Survey, http://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercycleatmosphere.html

The earth is a vibrant dynamic organism which provides for its own protection from any known or imagined threat. Basically, the earth is alive in a fashion and manner we will probably never fully understand and it can provide for its own defense. The earth exists in cycles and one of those cycles is to raise or lower the global temperature in accordance to the needs it has. The alleged rise in global temperature is wanted because the higher the global temperature, the more water vapor exists in the atmosphere which in turn enhances the protections from harmful cancer causing solar radiation. The higher the global temperature, the more water is readily available for precipitation in the form of rain, snow, dew etc.

Does this invalidate the need for air pollution reduction? Not at all BUT the methodology currently used is insanely ineffective. The space needed to build and maintain solar panel fields is monumental waste when the “green” electrical power production can be accomplished far more efficiently. How do I know this to be true? I invented the electrical generator that is small and efficient-providing all the renewable electrical energy needed with a surplus. The difference is that what I created is a small portable electrical generator suitable for the individual home and small business, capable of producing all the electricity the home would require WITH a sale-able surplus.
Under the existing supply system, electricity has to be created off site, and channeled to the end user at high cost. Sometimes that channeling requires the building and maintaining transmission lines over significant distances. Under the system I invented, the reverse occurs. Electricity at 60 hertz, 240 volts is created at the location of the user and what isn't used can then be channeled onto the grid for use by any other party. Consider how much it costs to generate electricity, transmit it to a neighborhood for use by 100 homes. Under what I designed, this works in reverse. Electricity is generated at the individual home where it is not susceptible to downed power lines due to storms or any outside natural or man made influence. Power outages are relatively non existent. The surplus electricity is channeled onto the existing electrical grid. The combined surplus electricity from 100 homes provides significantly lower electrical costs for businesses, prisons, government etc. Efficiency-I HATE INEFFICIENCY.

Building the devices that purge the ground level air pollution was designed in the 1990's that are efficient and effective but that is for another article.

Cecil Lee Russell

No comments:

Post a Comment