Popular Posts

Search This Blog

Friday, December 8, 2017

Fighting wildfires

Fighting wildfires is a serious and daunting task and throughout America. 2017 has been a year of devastating wildfires especially in Montana and California, causing billions of dollars in damages and causing the deaths of numerous firefighters. There exists a machine more suitable to fighting raging wildfires. It is a prototype developed originally to fight the oil filed fires in Kuwait caused by Saddam Hussein. I believe that this prototype can be modified to fight the raging wildfires in America. Watch this video, what do you think?


Saturday, May 7, 2016

Videos I recommend:

The State-The Belief that Good people are law abiding: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6uVV2Dcqt0

The incomprehensibly Big Lie - Larken Rose: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SZ0jykSMIA

No matter who is elected-All elections are for tyrants ONLY: Few people can comprehend that Communism, Socialism, or even Nazism is where is America is headed. The tools of a Tyrant: "It Can't Happen Here!"

Sunday, April 3, 2016

Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the misfits in the cult of climate change when the universe came into being?

Every hour of every day I hear some complaint or another about :climate change,” and most specifically how government is needed to save the earth, yet none-not one-of these cultists will answer my simple question: Where were you when the earth and the universe came into existence? As far as I can tell, the earth has survived and recovered from cataclysmic catastrophic events long before the cult of “climate change” (formerly called “global warming” by cultists.
  • First let us examine the term “cult” to determine if “climate change” adherents are actually cultists. A “CULT” is defined as “a religious or social group with socially deviant or novel beliefs and practices according to wikipedia.i
  • The word "cult" was originally used not to describe a group of religionists, but for the act of worship or religious ceremony. It was first used in the early 17th century, borrowed via the French culte, from Latin cultus (worship). This, in turn, was derived from the adjective cultus (inhabited, cultivated, worshiped), based on the verb colere (care, cultivate).ii
  • According to purported “scientific” allegations, the earth has gone through several major cataclysmic and catastrophic upheavals in history. “About 450 million years ago, the Ordovician-Silurian event caused the death of approximately 85 percent of the life in the Earth's oceans. The BBC states that nearly all life on Earth lived in oceans during this time period. The second cataclysmic event occurred 359 million years ago during the Devonian period. The Devonian mass extinctions are thought to have occurred over the course of millions of years and included several mass extinction events. This event also mostly affected seas and sea life. Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the other misfits in the cult of climate change to save the earth from this life threatening damage to all humanity? Answer: Nowhere to be found. The earth repaired itself without any insignificant assistance from cultists.
  • According to Wikipedia, the next mass extinction is thought to have killed approximately 96 percent of life on Earth during the Permian mass extinctions, which occurred over the course of millions of years. The Triassic-Jurassic extinctions affected marine life, birds and reptiles, and caused about 50 percent of land and sea animals to become extinct. The dinosaur extinctions occurred during the fifth cataclysmic event on record. During the Cretaceous-Tertiary event, the fifth cataclysm, the Earth was affected by many events that caused extinctions to occur. The final event that prompted mass dinosaur and sea life extinctions was a meteor that hit southern Mexico.iv Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the other misfits in the cult of climate change to save the earth from this life threatening damage to all humanity? Answer: Nowhere to be found. The earth repaired itself without any insignificant assistance from cultists.
  • That website does not mention what some refer to as a “global catastrophic” event which is alleged to have occurred during the 6th century according to the website “Ancient Origins.”iii According to that site, “There was a sign from the sun, the like of which had never been seen and reported before. The sun became dark and its darkness lasted for 18 months. Each day, it shone for about four hours, and still this light was only a feeble shadow. Everyone declared that the sun would never recover its full light again.” Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the other misfits in the cult of climate change to save the earth from this life threatening damage to all humanity? Answer: Nowhere to be found. The earth repaired itself without any insignificant assistance from cultists.
  • Since the beginning of recorded history, there have been numerous events that impacted the human existence and the earth repaired itself quite well without any assistance from cultists. In Thera, Greece around 1.600 BC, The eruption of the volcano on the Greek island is thought to have produced up to 40 times the volume of magma than the twentieth- century eruption at Mount St. Helens, destroyed and damaged crops, and been so significant that it could even have altered the global climate. Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the other misfits in the cult of climate change to save the earth from this life threatening damage to all humanity? Answer: Nowhere to be found. The earth repaired itself without any insignificant assistance from cultists. Such speculation is typical of theorists who actually believe their theories are actual fact but like all theories, that is all it is. Despite their best intentions, no legislation or human effort would have made one iota of difference because the puny efforts of fanatics is just that-puny, meaningless, of none effect.
  • Mount Vesuvius, Italy in AD 79, Mount Vesuvius in Naples, Italy, remains one of the most dangerous volcanoes in the world, exacerbated by the fact that a population of 3,000,000 live in close proximity. The deadly power of Vesuvius was dramatically demonstrated in AD 79, when a monumental eruption wiped out the Roman cities of Herculaneum and Pompeii, but Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the other misfits in the cult of climate change to save the earth from this life threatening damage to all humanity? Answer: Nowhere to be found. The earth repaired itself without any insignificant assistance from cultists.
  • Hatepe, New Zealand around AD 180, the Hatepe eruption at New Zealand's Lake Taupo is considered to be one of the largest volcanic eruptions of the last 5,000 years. The lake itself had been formed as a result of the Oruanui eruption, the world's largest known eruption in the last 70,000 years. But while no records can possibly exist of this event, the more recent Hatepe explosion was so huge that it was noted to have turned the sky red in China, and even in Rome. The earth survived and repaired itself quite well without any assistance from climate change cultists like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the misfits in the cult of climate change.
  • Mount Etna, Italy in 1669. Since 1500 BC, more than 150 incidents of lava eruptions have been recorded, and a countless number of smaller eruptions regularly occur at the summit. The largest and most destructive eruption of Mount Etna came in the spring of 1669. An initial earthquake and consequent lava flow signalled the start of the eruption and destroyed or damaged more than 40 towns, leaving between 20,000 and 60,000 people homeless. After three days of serious earthquakes, a 7-mile-long crevice had formed from which torrents of lava flowed. The 65-foot-high city walls of nearby Catania were no match for the lava, and large parts of the city were destroyed. Mankind had spent many years building that wall which fell in less than a day symbolizing the efforts of cultists attempting to control the activity of the earth. Humans spent decades and millions of dollars building the protection from the acts of the earth and the earth snorted at their efforts and destroyed it all within one day. Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the misfits in the cult of climate change?
  • Tambora, Indonesia in 1815, on the Indonesian island of Sumbawa, erupted with such magnitude that it may have resulted in worldwide climate change. The volume of magma that spewed from the volcano is estimated to be around 24 cubic miles but more importantly, several million tons of sulphur dioxide were emitted into the Earth's atmosphere. The gas quickly turned into a large cloud which encircled the Earth and scattered sulphuric acid droplets in the form of acid rain. It also led to a massive cooling of the entire Earth's surface, and 1816 became known in Europe and America as the “year without a summer,” where snow was recorded falling in New England in June. Despite this, it would be almost 80 years before scientists in the Western world would make a connection between the massive eruption at Tambora, and the worldwide phenomenon of climate change. Notice that the alleged connection between the volcano eruption and the theory of climate change has absolutely nothing to do with any form of human activity and there is absolutely nothing cultists could do to alter that eruption. Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the other misfits in the cult of climate change to save the earth from this life threatening damage to all humanity? Answer: Nowhere to be found. The earth repaired itself without any insignificant assistance from cultists.
  • Krakatoa, Indonesia in 1883. When Krakatoa erupted in 1883, the noise and the shock waves were recorded around the world. Further, stunningly colorful sunsets and sunrises, and a blue-greening of the sun and moon, were observed across the globe. Like Tambora, the gas and dust emitted into the atmosphere caused the Earth's temperatures to fall, and scientists now finally had the proof they needed to link volcanic eruptions with global climate change. Again, not one single human activity had one itty bitty iota of effect on the issue of climate change but more importantly, the earth repaired itself quite well without ANY EFFORT OR INVOLVEMENT from the insignificant, puny efforts of climate change cultists. Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the misfits in the cult of climate change?
  • Mount Pelée, Martinique in 1902, on the Caribbean island of Martinique has been called the worst volcanic disaster of the twentieth century. More than 30,000 people are thought to have died in this eruption. The volcano had been showing signs of danger for several weeks before the main blast, producing minor earthquakes and the emission of dust and ash into the atmosphere. Many people in the surrounding villages spotted the danger signs and fled to the nearby city of St. Pierre for protection. They could have no idea what was to follow. On the May 8, just over two weeks since the activity began, Mount Pelée erupted in dramatic fashion. A burning pyroclastic lava flow sped toward the city of St. Pierre, reaching it in under a minute, instantly destroying everything in its path. The population of 28,000 had been swollen by the influx of refugees, and almost nobody survived. On May 20 a second eruption of comparable force destroyed anything that had been left of St. Pierre 12 days earlier. Where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the other misfits in the cult of climate change to save the earth from this life threatening damage to all humanity? Answer: Nowhere to be found. The earth repaired itself without any insignificant assistance from cultists.
  • Mount St. Helens, Washington 1980, caused economic devastation in the region. In 1978, volcanologists Dwight Crandell and Donald Mullineaux warned that Mount St. Helens, in Washington State, USA, would erupt before the end of the century. On May 18 1980, their prediction came true with horrifying consequences. The disaster began with a large earthquake at 8:32 that morning measuring 5.1 on the Richter scale, and triggering a series of explosions that increased in frequency and intensity. The eruption reached its peak with a violent explosion around 3:50 pm, causing the largest debris avalanche ever recorded to power 14 miles west. On top of this a large cloud of ash rose up to 15 miles into the atmosphere. The combined results of the seismic activity throughout the day devastated the landscape. The environmental cost was one thing, but the human cost was to be even more significant. Moments after the main avalanche, an explosive blast ripped through the area destroying everything in its path, killing 57 people. The indirect “human cost” which was the main tragedy of Mount St. Helens. Aside from the human lives lost, the eruption caused more than $1 billion worth of damage, primarily to the lumber and agricultural industries. Forests, roads, bridges, recreational sites, houses, trails, railways and wildlife habitats were obliterated or damaged. Tourism to the region fell and unemployment rose in the immediate aftermath of the disaster. The economic consequences for a region which supplies lumber and agricultural resources not only to the Pacific Northwest but also to the whole country were huge. Somebody please explain to me how human activity had anything to do with this natural catastrophe and where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sander, Al Gore and all the other misfits in the cult of climate change to save the earth from this life threatening damage to all humanity? They were alive when this occurred. What legislation that government could enact would have prevented or curtailed the eruption of Mount St. Helens? Just how could man have prevented this? Most important though is the simple fact that the earth repaired itself WITHOUT ANY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM CULTISTS.
  • My point in this contemptuous article is simple. There is no human activity that can alter the earths climate and the earth, which is alive in a fashion and in a manner humans may never understand, can heal and repair itself without any legislation that the cultists would have government impose on human existence. The desires for governmental legislation is for personal greed, not salvation of humanity because cultists know that there is lots of money to be made in governmental regulations. All who spout “climate change” are simply greedy self serving individuals seeking to enrich themselves off of the efforts of every day Americans because without government, climate change cultists would actually have to get a job.
Cecil Lee Russell

Sunday, February 28, 2016

"Hope and Change" to "Make America Great Again." The symphony is the mindless voter.

Just as Obama made all these great and grand promises of Hope and Change with little in the way of substance and he [Obama] could not ennunciate a simple objective or plan to accomplish these goals of hope and change that did not violate the Constitution and the voters and followers went around chanting hope and change, likewise Trump campaigns on all these great and grand promises of making America great again with little in the way of substance that he [Trump] can ennunciate in a simple objective or plan of action to accomplish these goals of making America great again that do not violate the Constitution while the voters and followers of Trump go around chanting Make America Great Again.
What makes America GREAT is freedom and Liberty-to go about your daily life free from government interference and mindlessly created regulations, licenses and the like. Everyone who reads this has committed a Class A misdemenaor of a class 3 felony EVERY DAY IN THE PAST 5 YEARS and you are so blind to the effects of your votes that you are completely oblivious to the fact that you are and have been a felon for quite awhile. An example if I may.
Whether or not you accept it or believe it, the state violates the US Constitution by requiring you to obtain a drivers license to drive on the public streets.

[ Streets and highways are established and maintained for the purpose of travel and transportation by the public. Such travel may be for business or pleasure. "The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived."
Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22;
Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934;
Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607;
25 Am. Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491 (the state cannot constitutionally make a law mandating that you have to have a drivers license to operate your personal property.)

“Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can 'NOT BE INFRINGED'. (emphasis added) ,,,No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE. "The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government." Shapiro vs. Thomson, 394 U. S. 618 April 21, 1969. A Supreme Court decision.

"The claim and exercise of a Constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489.] another Supreme Court decision.

Here is my point made above about unknowingly committing a felony because of excessive regulations:-Every time a police officer writes a ticket for no drivers license, that police officer commits a Federal offense that can carry from 1 year in a federal prison.
Title 18 USC Section 242.
18 U.S.C. § 242 : US Code - Section 242: Deprivation of rights under color of law.
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both...in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."
Under Federal law, every time a cop shoots someone without probable cause, the cop could legally be executed by death penalty.
This is but one example-albeit-an extreme one, of the useless and senseless laws that exist on the books which you do not even know exist because there are so many. Another example: If you drive on a Texas multi-lane highway and you maintain your vehicle in the far left hand lane, you could be ticketed and fined up to $240.00.
Almost every one of you who intend to vote for Trump intend to cause America to be further mired in more excessive regulations until one day-when you find yourself in jail, facing a felony you did not even know existed, there will be no-one to listen to your complaint because like Obama voters, you mindlessly followed the crowd.

Saturday, February 20, 2016

"Global Warming-Climate Change" Is it real and is it harmful?

One of the major issues with which politicians around the world seems to be obsessed with is what was once called 'Global Warming', a title that was altered to 'climate change' after proponents were discovered 'fabricating evidence' in support of their position.
1-"Global Warming ‘Experts’ Admit: We Lied" Warner Todd Huston September 17, 2013 http://wizbangblog.com/2013/09/17/global-warming-experts-admit-we-lied/
2-“World’s Biggest Lie has been exposed: Evil heart of the “global warming” hoax Global Warming: The BIGGEST LIE Exposed.” Alan Caruba, September 21, 2013 http://canadafreepress.com/article/global-warming-the-biggest-lie-exposed
3-”When scientists lie.” Ralph Peters, December 12, 2009 http://nypost.com/2009/12/12/when-scientists-lie/
4-”How the lie of global warming consensus among scientists came to pass.” Lorraine Cohen; San Diego Conservative Examiner-April 15, 2013: http://www.examiner.com/article/how-the-lie-of-global-warming-consensus-among-scientists-came-to-pass

What could be so important about an idea/issue that supporting that idea/issue could lead you to lie in public?
First: “What IS Climate Change? According to one leading dictionary reference, climate change is “a change in global or regional climate patterns, in particular a change apparent from the mid to late 20th century onwards and attributed largely to the increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide produced by the use of fossil fuels.” 
1. the composite or generally prevailing weather conditions of a region, as temperature, air pressure, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness, and winds, throughout the year, averaged over a series of years.
2. a region or area characterized by a given climate:
3. the prevailing attitudes, standards, or environmental conditions of a group, period, or place:
1. to make the form, nature, content, future course, etc., of (something) different from what it is or from what it would be if left alone: to change one's name; to change one's opinion; to change the course of history.
2. to transform or convert (usually followed by into): The witch changed the prince into a toad.
3. to substitute another or others for; exchange for something else, usually of the same kind:
She changed her shoes when she got home from the office.
4. to give and take reciprocally; interchange: to change places with someone.
5. to transfer from one (conveyance) to another: You'll have to change planes in Chicago.
6. to give or get an equivalent amount of money in lower denominations in exchange for:
to change a five-dollar bill.
7. to give or get foreign money in exchange for: to change dollars into francs.

The science is clear: Human activity is causing our climate to change.”

According to Wikipedia entry-”Climate Change:” Climate change is a change in the statistical distribution of weather patterns when that change lasts for an extended period of time (i.e., decades to millions of years). Climate change may refer to a change in average weather conditions, or in the time variation of weather around longer-term average conditions (i.e., more or fewer extreme weather events). Climate change is caused by factors such as biotic processes, variations in solar radiation received by Earth, plate tectonics, and volcanic eruptions. Certain human activities have also been identified as significant causes of recent climate change, often referred to as "global warming". Scientists actively work to understand past and future climate by using observations and theoretical models. A climate record—extending deep into the Earth's past—has been assembled, and continues to be built up, based on geological evidence from borehole temperature profiles, cores removed from deep accumulations of ice, floral and faunal records, glacial and periglacial processes, stable-isotope and other analyses of sediment layers, and records of past sea levels. More recent data are provided by the instrumental record. General circulation models, based on the physical sciences, are often used in theoretical approaches to match past climate data, make future projections, and link causes and effects in climate change.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change

According to the EPA-[United States Environmental Protection Agency] “Climate Change: Basic Information”-”Climate change is happening. Our Earth is warming. Earth's average temperature has risen by 1.5°F over the past century, and is projected to rise another 0.5 to 8.6°F over the next hundred years. Small changes in the average temperature of the planet can translate to large and potentially dangerous shifts in climate and weather.
The evidence is clear. Rising global temperatures have been accompanied by changes in weather and climate. Many places have seen changes in rainfall, resulting in more floods, droughts, or intense rain, as well as more frequent and severe heat waves. The planet's oceans and glaciers have also experienced some big changes - oceans are warming and becoming more acidic, ice caps are melting, and sea levels are rising. As these and other changes become more pronounced in the coming decades, they will likely present challenges to our society and our environment.”

According to the David Suzuki Foundation-(http://www.davidsuzuki.org/issues/climate-change/science/climate-change-basics/climate-change-101-1/) [There's a lot of information floating around about climate change. Most people know it has something to do with industrial pollution, changing weather and car exhaust, and they kind of get what Al Gore was trying to say in An Inconvenient Truth. In a nutshell, climate change occurs when long-term weather patterns are altered — for example, through human activity. Global warming is one measure of climate change, and is a rise in the average global temperature.]

Why is concern for “climate change” so important”? Let us examine the claims and allegations of supporters. Everyone who has any education has heard of N.A.S.A.-The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. According to the Frequenty Asked Questions page- http://climate.nasa.gov/faq/ - “Climate Change” is caused by [Most climate scientists agree the main cause of the current global warming trend is human expansion of the "greenhouse effect" warming that results when the atmosphere traps heat radiating from Earth toward space. Certain gases in the atmosphere block heat from escaping. Long-lived gases that remain semi-permanently in the atmosphere and do not respond physically or chemically to changes in temperature are described as "forcing" climate change. Gases, such as water vapor, which respond physically or chemically to changes in temperature are seen as "feedbacks."]
[An interesting article can be found at http://www.ifm-sei.org/files/up/climate-change-the-basic-facts.pdf]

The idea of man made climate change or global warming IS NOT a global consensus. For every article supporting the concept, there is a corresponding article refuting it.
-Climate Change, The Solar Weather Technique & The future of Forecasting – WeatherAct
Conference Imperial College London 28 Oct 2009 - Session 1 http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews09No80.pdf

National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Goddard Institute for Space Studies; GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/
Global Warming & Climate Change Myths- A summary of global warming-climate change myths, sorted by recent popularity vs what science says. http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
The Gaia Hypothesis: Conjectures and Refutations; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1023494111532

In short, for every opinion-scientific or amateur- there is a corresponding opposite opinion. I have a different position which I have not heard from any other person. I hold that IF there is a trend towards a global temperature rise, it is something that we should want. I WANT the global temperature to rise. Let me explain.

Global warming advocates claim that the melting of the polar caps will cause the oceans to rise. “Scientists Warn of Rising Oceans From Polar Melt.” Justin Gillis and Kenneth Chang May 12, 2014 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/13/science/earth/collapse-of-parts-of-west-antarctica-ice-sheet-has-begun-scientists-say.html?_r=0

As dramatic as that may sound, it is impossible. Why? Ice occupies multiple times more volume than does water. Ice is less dense than liquid water, which means that for the same mass, ice occupies more space. Water has to expand as it freezes. http://www.ask.com/science/ice-weigh-water-749f3a207f81e1b8
Simultaneously, as ice melts and converts into water-water evaporates and converts into water vapor. So, if the entire polar caps were to melt, the oceans would lower BUT simultaneous to this lowering, water vapor would rise merging with the upper atmosphere which then acts to reflect and deflect excessive harmful solar radiation. U.S. Geological Survey, http://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercycleatmosphere.html

The earth is a vibrant dynamic organism which provides for its own protection from any known or imagined threat. Basically, the earth is alive in a fashion and manner we will probably never fully understand and it can provide for its own defense. The earth exists in cycles and one of those cycles is to raise or lower the global temperature in accordance to the needs it has. The alleged rise in global temperature is wanted because the higher the global temperature, the more water vapor exists in the atmosphere which in turn enhances the protections from harmful cancer causing solar radiation. The higher the global temperature, the more water is readily available for precipitation in the form of rain, snow, dew etc.

Does this invalidate the need for air pollution reduction? Not at all BUT the methodology currently used is insanely ineffective. The space needed to build and maintain solar panel fields is monumental waste when the “green” electrical power production can be accomplished far more efficiently. How do I know this to be true? I invented the electrical generator that is small and efficient-providing all the renewable electrical energy needed with a surplus. The difference is that what I created is a small portable electrical generator suitable for the individual home and small business, capable of producing all the electricity the home would require WITH a sale-able surplus.
Under the existing supply system, electricity has to be created off site, and channeled to the end user at high cost. Sometimes that channeling requires the building and maintaining transmission lines over significant distances. Under the system I invented, the reverse occurs. Electricity at 60 hertz, 240 volts is created at the location of the user and what isn't used can then be channeled onto the grid for use by any other party. Consider how much it costs to generate electricity, transmit it to a neighborhood for use by 100 homes. Under what I designed, this works in reverse. Electricity is generated at the individual home where it is not susceptible to downed power lines due to storms or any outside natural or man made influence. Power outages are relatively non existent. The surplus electricity is channeled onto the existing electrical grid. The combined surplus electricity from 100 homes provides significantly lower electrical costs for businesses, prisons, government etc. Efficiency-I HATE INEFFICIENCY.

Building the devices that purge the ground level air pollution was designed in the 1990's that are efficient and effective but that is for another article.

Cecil Lee Russell

Sunday, December 13, 2015

What IF, Every US Embassy were expanded to double as trade port for US goods and trade.

The strength of any National Economy is its ability to conduct trade. The more vigorous the trade, the stronger the National economy. Almost every Nation has an embassy, the US is no exception, but what I have noticed is that embassies are filled with bureaucrats who actually produce nothing of value but WHAT IF, America were to begin using each of its embassies as a focal point for US trade export/import? WHAT IF, every US embassy were expanded to become a complete US city w...here not only National representative "business" occurred but also where US export could be obtained by locals of that area.
When the US was first formed, the Federal government was funded almost entirely by tariffs on imported trade. If the Nations embassies were to be expanded into centers of trade, working jointly with the regional government, could not American exports find a more directed target market for American goods? Certainly, there would be issues but I am of the opinion that if every city had a strong economy, much of the chaos and subsequent violence in the world would be dampened.
I would be interested in hearing responses and opinions about this opinion.
Cecil Lee Russell

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

My Suggested Response to Obamacare for Citizens!

If I may suggest: The passing of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, (Public Law 111–148
Stat. 124 Stat. 119 through 124 Stat. 1025) was enacted illegally. Bribing an elected Federal Official to vote a certain way IS Bribery. Push the issue in the public forum until the democrats respond negatively and then push harder. Drive them into self destruction in the public eye.

18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses:
(a) For the purpose of this section -
(1) the term "public official" means Member of Congress...
(3) the term "official act" means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official's official capacity, or in such official's place of trust or profit.
(b) Whoever -
(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent -
(A) to influence any official act;
(2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:
(A) being influenced in the performance of any official act;
Let the conversation be directed to how much time President Obama, former Speaker Pelosi and Senator Majority Leader Read are going to receive for bribing federal officials and let this be the focus of future conversations concerning "Obamacare." You will need to find a Presidental Candidate which carries this as one of his/her campaign issues. This Is an issue that is a part of my proposed campaign.

Cecil L Russell for 2012